Aryan invasion theory{AIT}was rejected by its propounder, German scholar Max Mueller himself. Sir Jadunath Sarkar, Bal Gangadhar Tilak

Aryan invasion theory{AIT}was rejected by its propounder, German scholar Max Mueller himself. Sir Jadunath Sarkar, Bal Gangadhar Tilak

Dr Stan T Metzenberg, a California biologist, rejected Prof Witzel's insistence that the 'Aryan invasion' theory should be retained, by citing scientific evidence.

"I've read the DNA research and there was no Aryan migration," he retorted, adding, "I believe the hard evidence of DNA more than I believe historians."

Witzel rallied the support of some other Left historians and scholars - they described themselves as 'a panel of international experts on India and Hinduism' - to launch a virulent campaign against parents pushing for change in curriculum by branding them as "Hindutva brigade" and encouraged others to hurl scurrilous allegations against California's Hindus.

(source: Harvard don denigrates Hindus - By Kanchan Gupta - dailypioneer.com December 25 2005)

Aryan invasion theory{AIT}was rejected by its propounder, German scholar Max Mueller himself. Sir Jadunath Sarkar, Bal Gangadhar Tilak & othr eminent historians hv rubbished it also.None of its supporters couldnt quote a single verse frm rigveda supportng AIT.Stil it continues 2 b in our textbuks.Britishers n Leftist historians continue 2 pamper AIT 2 maintain north-south divide in India.



You refer to India as the sub-continent, but could you tell me exactly what it is sub too?” Of course, the saying was intended to imply subordinate to Her Majesty the Queen. It was a bit of an embarrassment to run into a culture that not only claimed that its history went back fifty or sixty thousand years, but that it was also the basis for your own language and literature!

The British couldn’t accept this and so the scholars of the time made up a theory, which said that there was a group of people called the Aryans, who lived in the Steppes of Russia, and this horseback riding people rode into India one thousand five hundred years ago with these books called the Vedas under their arms. Unfortunately, what they did not take into account was the fact that the Vedas contained astronomical calculations that went back seven thousand years! Now there is no instance or evidence of a horseback riding culture having observatories who watched the stars over a period of seven thousand years. Nevertheless, Western scholars overlooked this inconsistency and believed the theory that the Aryans came riding into India and conquered the dark skinned Dravidians with their superior technology and their superior wisdom. "

(source: The Greatness of the Vedas - by Jeffrey Armstrong). Refer to Out of India Theory - wikipedia.org. Refer to chapter on First Indologists and European Imperialism

Sarahi Alcaraz That's right! And Dravidian languages are more than 50% sanskrit! Who came first?....ahaaa.....same number Spanish conquistadors did to the Mayans. Plus Valmiki in Ramayana states that their vedic knowledge came from the west across the sea. Mayan n Sanskrit are very similiar: Chakra =sanskrit, Chakla=Mayan, Kundalini=sanskrit, Kulthanlilni=Mayan, Chun=monkey, same for mayan etc......all was well established before anybody came to India.i.e. muslims, christians, etc.



Colonialism nearly killed India's capacity to know its past; globalization threatens to destroy its will. Sheldon Pollock Professor of Sanskrit and Indian Studies at Columbia University has said
source: Digital Memory - - outlookindia.com).